I’ve long thought that Christians and social conservatives express themselves badly on the homosexual issue. The tack should be, liberals are always concerned with coercing people to give material things to people: take money away from workers and give it to those who don’t work to buy food, housing, contraceptives, education, what have you. They call conservatives heartless because they don’t buy into this redistribution of wealth, forced charity, if you will.
Christians and conservatives should aver that we feel homosexuality is destructive and hurtful to the person who practices it. While libs and gays claim they are “born” that way and they have no choice, they DO have a choice not to engage in homosexual sex. And no laws should be passed to ENCOURAGE sinful, destructive and hurtful behaviour (not to mention deadly, as in AIDS). We want to help them, not hate or hurt them. The heartless democrats and liberals are unfeeling of the spiritual life and health of homosexuals.
Far be it for me to defend kenye west, who is a world-class douche of the first water, but anti-fur crybabies are far worse on the universal scale of douchebaggery.
Ironic that the people whinging about the lamb’s foetus wool are probably pro-abortion for humans. This is so much crap with you ‘animal cruelty’ titbits. So what if slaughtered lamb’s wool is used for clothing. Would you rather they threw it away after slaughtering the lamb for meat?
Well, David Frum (the turn-coat Kos asslicker who makes a living trashing the people who gave him his start) manages to write the most graceless piece possible about Andrew Breitbart’s death, but what can you expect.
He goes on to say Andrew wasn’t a racist. Some of his commenters give him props for that.
No, he just accuses Andrew of racist behaviour, then tries to modify it by saying he wasn’t an actual racist, he just talked like one. Fuck frum, if he wasn’t a useful idiot for the left, he wouldn’t have a job. As it is, they hold him to castigate conservatives as if he had some kind of moral weight. He doesn’t. He’s a douchebag and a pantload.
And Yglesias, did Breitbart ever come down to where you work and slap the cock out of your mouth? Matty’s panties are so bunched up he can probably ride them to orgasm. Fuck you asshole. Obviously Breitbart landed a few on your side, that’s why you hate him and gloat over his death. Well, there’s millions more where he came from, buddy. And we’re all going to bully your gay ass like you’re still a highschool Judy Garland fan with a pink-streaked mullet and a fringed leather jacket and fairy boots.
This post raped my vagina with stupid, and if I feel raped, it must be real. I’m a woman and therefore I ride the ultimate and unimpeachable moral highhorse. My weapons are smug self-righteousness in one hand and condescension in the other.
I wonder if it counts as “rape” to have your brain sucked out or your body dismembered and taken out piece by piece because your very existence is inconvenient to your mother? That would seem more like rape than some petty indignity like a sonogram.
This occurred to me when the Vince Vaughan controversy about saying electric cars were for fags (they are) and the gay lobby got their panties all twisted up in their butt-cracks, and not in a good way.
Homosexuals have pretty much settles on “gay” as a euphemism for men who like to suck cock, put their penis in another man’s asshole (tops), have another man put his penis in their asshole (bottoms), or do a little of both (versatile) and other ancillary acts like adoring Madonna.
Ok, that’s gay and that’s cool. The rest of us aren’t referring to that when we use the word “fag” (mostly)- they have decided they want to be called “gay”, and have co-opted the word and it can no longer be used in it’s original sense, it’s so associated with homosexuality (you can’t call it “faggotry”).
Wow, romney manages to get some conservatives to vote for him, like that proves a goddamn thing.
You’re missing the point. Yeah, romney gets a good share of conservatives who hold their nose. However, turnout is less than in 2008. Meaning, a good many conservatives are sitting home. No one ever said romney won’t get _any_ conservatives: what I (and others) are saying is enough will refuse to vote for him under any circumstances to doom him in the general.